2012.05.24 · First X-ray
The attached description states that one femoral head appears dislocated from its socket in the pelvis.
MARU / ANIMAL CASE RECORDS
Following each story
through the records.
PhotosVideosTest resultsClinical records
Real animal cases from Maru’s existing attachments.
A MAP OF THE RECORDS
First, we clarify
what each record documents.
Each animal’s condition, treatment process and surviving records differ. We look separately at records that describe clinical progress and records that show test results.
| Case | Available records | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cat in a traffic accident | Two X-rays from 2012 and the hospital’s case presentation notes | Attachment 1 |
| 3 spinal nerve injury cases | Brochure photos and dates, 2015–2016 | Attachment 2 |
| Teddy | Tests and clinical care in 2023; gold thread procedure photos | Attachments 3·15 |
| Sarangi | One PetAge360 result, July 2026 | Attachment 5 |
| Pangi | Two PetAge360 results (Aug. and Sept. 2026) and the hospital’s explanation | Attachment 14 |
| Videos | List of videos featuring the director, treatment introductions and the hospital | Attachment 18 |
Dates, values and descriptions for each case are summarized from the relevant attachments. We also indicate which records support each case.
CASE / CAT · 2012
A cat injured in a traffic accident:
X-rays at two points in time.
Attachment 1 presents the case of a cat that injured its pelvis and hip joints in a traffic accident in the early hours of May 14, 2012. It includes X-rays dated May 24 and August 4, 2012, from the hospital’s presentation materials.
2012.08.04 · Second X-ray
The attached description states that both femoral heads appear positioned toward the joint sockets.
Explanation in the hospital’s presentation materials
The materials contain the hospital’s explanation that changes appeared in the joint area after Maru’s special prescription. They also include a later update from the owner that the cat was running well, using the litter box properly, and showing no inflammation or after-effects.
We read the photos and the explanation together.
These are two X-rays and the explanation from the presentation materials. The photos alone are not used to judge the mechanism of new joint formation or the sole effect of any specific prescription. The hospital’s explanation and the owner’s update are kept separate.
Source: Attachment 1, “Cat Traffic Accident Recovery Case” · Maru case presentation PPT, pp. 2–4.
CASE / SPINAL NERVE · 2015–2016
Spinal nerve injuries:
three records from the brochure.
Attachment 2 contains three “Nerve recovery cases after treatment” from the Maru Animal Hospital brochure. The titles and dates below are as stated in the attachment.
Recovery case: spinal nerve transection at lumbar L4–L5 from a traffic accident
Treatment date2015.09.03→Improvement date in the records2015.09.14
The brochure states “Day 11”. The original record also notes “See café video”.
Nerve paralysis caused by a disc at lumbar L6–L7
Treatment date2016.11.11→Improvement date in the records2016.11.16
The brochure states “Day 5”.
Treatment case: lumbar L3–L4 stenosis (disc)
Treatment date2016.12.22→Improvement date in the records2016.12.29
The brochure states “Day 7”.
These materials are before-and-after photos and dates from the brochure. They should not be read as quantitative measurements of nerve function or as a clinical trial comparing the effect of any particular chamber.
Source: Attachment 2, “Spinal Nerve Injury Recovery Cases”.
CASE / TEDDY · 2023
From the U.S. to Korea:
Teddy’s test and clinical records.
Teddy is recorded as a 13-year-old neutered male Yorkshire Terrier as of 2023. Attachment 3 compiles test and clinical records from ANTECH in the U.S., NEODIN (ordered by Maru), and the Konkuk University and Seoul National University veterinary hospitals.
Clinical findings from Konkuk University list severe systemic hypertension, chronic kidney disease and gallstones. Other care, including oral medication and subcutaneous fluids, was given during the same period.
BUN·Creatinine trend in the records
BUN mg/dL
Creatinine mg/dL
| Test date | Facility | BUN | Creatinine |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023.07.18 | ANTECH (U.S.) | 62 | 1.9 |
| 2023.08.03 | ANTECH (U.S.) | 107 | 2.4 |
| 2023.08.30 | NEODIN · ordered by Maru | 77.2 | 2.0 |
| 2023.09.01 | Konkuk Univ. Veterinary Hospital | 65 | 2.3 |
| 2023.09.07 | Konkuk Univ. Veterinary Hospital | 35 | 1.7 |
| 2023.10.05 | Seoul National Univ. Veterinary Hospital | 51.7 | 1.99 |
Unit: mg/dL. Reference ranges and test conditions differ between facilities. Values from different facilities should not be read as consecutive measurements under the same conditions.
What the clinical records show
The Seoul National University SOAP record of October 5, 2023 notes that Teddy had vomiting, loss of appetite and lethargy after returning to Korea, but that at the time his bowel movements and urination were good and he was going on walks well. The same record also covers oral medication, subcutaneous fluid management, and kidney and liver values.
We look at both the improvements and the findings that still need monitoring.
Imaging findings from the same period also record the need to differentiate a liver mass and the possibility of chronic kidney disease. Changes in some values or in activity alone are not taken to mean that all conditions have resolved.
Source: Attachment 3, “Teddy – Kidney Disease Test and Clinical Records” ②–⑪. This table focuses on test records whose dates and values match in the source text.
TEDDY / PROCEDURE RECORD
Gold thread procedure materials
linked to the test records.
Attachment 15 contains photos of Teddy’s gold thread (gold thread embedding) insertion and an abdominal X-ray. According to Maru’s explanation, gold thread was inserted in the liver and kidney areas, and life-energy care was carried out alongside it.
The attachment includes needle insertion photos of the back and flank. The photos themselves show no date. An X-ray marked October 2023 is included without a separate radiology reading.
Oral medication and subcutaneous fluids prescribed by the university veterinary hospitals were also given during the same period. These materials show the procedure and its explanation; they do not compare or isolate the sole effect of gold thread or energy care.
Source: Attachment 15, “Teddy – Gold Thread Procedure Photos and X-ray” · related tests and concurrent prescriptions in Attachment 3.
TELOMERE / TEST RECORDS
Sarangi and Pangi:
records from actual test reports.
July 20, 2026: a single test
The subject of the report is Sarangi, a 12-year-old female dog. The requesting facility is listed as Maru Animal Hospital.
Overall health score
65/ 100
Attention (as stated in the report)Age actual vs. biological age in the report
Aging rate calculated in the report
1.13×
Telomere length 2.80 kb · Very short
Overall health scoreActual ageBiological age{v} yrsAverage 1.0| Overall health score | 65 points · Attention |
|---|---|
| Telomere length | 2.80 kb · Very short |
| Biological age calculated in the report | 13.5 years |
| Aging rate calculated in the report | 1.13 |
These are the results and interpretations printed in the report. They come from a single measurement and are not a before-and-after treatment comparison. The indicators calculated in the report should not be read as the animal’s lifespan or as a confirmed diagnosis.
2026.08.07First day of the care period
2026.08.19Last day of the care periodTwo test results, 35 days apart
The subject of the reports is Pangi, an 11-year-old male dog. The materials compare two results, from August 18 and September 22, 2026.
| 1st · 2026.08.18 | 2nd · 2026.09.22 | Difference in recorded values |
|---|---|---|
| 2.80 kb | 3.08 kb | +0.28 kb · approx. 10% |
Values and units follow Attachment 14. Both reports record the grade as “Very short”.
We look at the timing of care and testing together.
According to Maru’s explanation, the care period was August 7–19, 2026. Because the first test was taken during the care period, the two results are not simply called ‘before and after treatment’.
Care period per Maru: 8/7–8/19Telomere testEye photo dates
Care periodEye photosTelomere testFirst day of the care periodLast day of the care period1st2ndThe hospital’s explanation of the eye condition
The existing attachment presents changes in Pangi’s cataracts and vision as the hospital’s explanation and includes eye photos from August 7 and 19.
Newly provided hospital explanation
Information newly provided in October 2026 states that one eye returned to normal after three sessions of quantum-related treatment, and that the other eye is still under treatment. This is presented separately, as a progress account provided by the owner and the hospital.
Because no ophthalmic examination records are included in the materials provided, we do not present this explanation or the eye photos as objective proof of restored vision or of the sole effect of any specific treatment. We do not assume or confirm the treatment name or specific conditions mentioned in the new explanation.
We do not compare the two animals’ values directly.
Sarangi and Pangi differ in age and in the timing and conditions of their tests, so their values are not compared with each other even though both are in kb. The difference in Pangi’s values alone does not establish the effect of any specific treatment or an extended lifespan.
Source: Attachment 5, “Sarangi PetAge360 Analysis Report” · Attachment 14, “Pangi – Comparison of Two Telomere Tests”.
RELATED VIDEO MATERIAL
Videos to watch
alongside the records.
The video list from Attachment 18. Titles and descriptions are based on the attachment. Posting dates may differ from filming or broadcast dates.
01
Telomere LAB café from the attachments →Treating Companion Animals through Natural MedicineWalpet TV · Posted 2021.05.25 · 12:02
Featuring Director Son Hwa-seop, introducing companion-animal treatment
↗02Featuring Director Son Hwa-seop, introducing companion-animal treatment
pet treatment videoSon Hwa-seop · Posted 2020.05.09 · 10:25
Collection of treatment scenes; explanation of a 2015.09.03 visit
↗03Collection of treatment scenes; explanation of a 2015.09.03 visit
Maru Animal Hospital – Interview with Director Son Hwa-seoplifewave-stars on group · Posted 2022.11.12 · approx. 9:24
Explanation of a cat’s hospitalization case
↗04Explanation of a cat’s hospitalization case
Maru Animal Hospital 20200128Son Hwa-seop · Posted 2022.02.25 · 19:28
Hospital introduction, embryo transfer and artificial insemination
↗05Hospital introduction, embryo transfer and artificial insemination
Director Son Hwa-seop: Dairy Cow Embryo Transfer on MBCMaru Animal Hospital · Posted 2024.08.09 · 7:25
Broadcast on embryo transfer and canine artificial insemination
↗Broadcast on embryo transfer and canine artificial insemination
Videos open at their original source in a new window. Explanations in video introductions or interviews are read separately from test and clinical records.
HOW TO READ A CASE
When reading the cases,
what to check as well.
If something looks better in a photo, does that prove the treatment worked?+
A photo shows how things looked at that moment. Judging the effect of a specific treatment requires looking at functional measurements, clinical records, concurrent treatments and comparison conditions together.
If test values change, can that be attributed to the equipment?+
Values can be affected by analysis conditions and variability, the animal’s condition and concurrent care. Two before-and-after values alone do not establish the sole effect of any equipment.
Are the time spans in these cases the expected recovery time for other animals?+
No. They are the intervals between recorded dates. Because each animal’s disease, condition and treatment process differ, the same timeframe or result cannot be promised.
Are all of these records the same kind of evidence?+
No. Clinical records, test results, photos, hospital explanations, owner updates and promotional videos each show different things. This page indicates the type of record and its source for each case.